Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Md. 315 - Wright v. Baker

Wright v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Offutt v. Montgomery County Board of Education (1979), Lohss and Sprenkle v. State (1974)

31 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shedlock v. Marshall · Dunstan v. Bethlehem Steel Co. · Beck v. Baltimore Transit Co. · Garozynski v. Daniel · Sieland v. Gallo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The appellant contends that the court erred in submitting the case to the jury on issues, to which action he objected by special exception. Under Rule 7, III. Trials, Rules of Practice and Procedure, the matter is . clearly within the discretion of the trial court, and we find no error. Issues are authorized by the rule and wre peculiarly appropriate in consolidated cases." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.