Lafontant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Mabry v. Johnson · Mabry v. Johnson · Chaney v. State · State v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plea agreement was not for a specific sentence and was not even for a recommendation of a specific sentence. The agreement was that the State would recommend a sentence that would include no more than four years active incarceration. At the time of the bargain, appellant should have understood that four years of active, unsuspended incarceration would implicate a period of probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlini v. State“Finally, because a period of probation must be attached to a suspended sentence, we hold that the right to impose a period of probation is included in any plea agreement that provides for a suspended sentence. If we were to hold otherwise, the imposition of a suspended sentence would be meaningless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlini v. State“10. Pay all fines, costs, restitution, and fees as ordered by the court or as directed by your supervising agent through a payment schedule ... Restitution of $2000/mo. [handwritten] to victims of restitution order [handwritten] ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlini v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.