Loomis v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 1946
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bauman v. Ross · People ex rel. Le Roy v. Hurlbut · State ex rel. Bulkeley v. Williams · Board of Commissioner v. Harrell · People ex rel. Hubbard v. Township Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the act centers to one main general object or purpose which the title comprehensively declares, though in general terms, and if provisions in the body of the act not directly mentioned in the title are germane, auxiliary or incidental to that general purpose, the constitutional requirement is met. “A title is but a descriptive caption, directing attention to the subject-matter which follows.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobson v. Carlson““An act to establish an insurance bureau.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.