Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 MICH 426 - Charlet v. Teakle

Charlet v. Teakle’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1947

8 state decisions

501917192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City Bank & Trust Co. v. Hurd · Seymour v. Long Dock Co. · Babcock v. Twist · Morrison v. Mayer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nothing in this chapter contained shall he construed to abridge the powers of the court of chancery to compel the specific performance of agreements, in cases of part performance of such agreements. ” ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.