State Bank v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1976
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matter of Marburg v. Cole · Mayor of New York v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Matter of Miller v. Kling · Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. Fund · People v. . Luhrs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To adopt the petitioner's view would be to deny banking facilities to residents of the state who live in populated but unincorporated areas wherein every other facility for modern living exists on the basis that the areas involved although eligible to do so had not been formally incorporated. The Legislature did not intend such and has expressly said so. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that it was not the intention of the Legislature to include within the provisions of the section any area which had not been incorporated as one of the statutory municipalities therein named.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would defy the plain words of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.