Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

197 N.C. 163

147 S.E 816

Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1929-05-01

Decided 1929-05-01

Per Curiam.

¶1 The defendant did not request the court below to find the facts upon which the rulings of the court below were based. In the absence of such finding, it is presumed that the court below, upon proper evidence, found facts sufficient to support the judgment. The whole matter is fully discussed and decisions cited in Holcomb v. Holcomb, 192 N. C., 504; Helderman v. Mills Co., 192 N. C., 626. See Lumber Co. v. Anderson, 196 N. C., 474; Realty Corp. v. Fisher, 196 N. C., 503; Coach Co. v. Griffin, 196 N. C., 559. The judgment of the court below is

¶2 Affirmed.

/197/nc/163 · .json · Public domain