Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 N.C. 280 - M. E. Gruber, Inc. v. Eubank

M. E. Gruber, Inc. v. Eubank’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2007

8 state decisions

30192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An easement, of course, is an interest in land, and if it is created by deed, either by express grant or by reservation, the description thereof must not be too uncertain, vague and indefinite.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.