197 N.C. App. 632 - State v. Streater’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daughtry v. United States · Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd. · Modjeski & Masters, Applicant, V · State v. Bagley · State v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the doctor] could testify that the physical findings[, or lack thereof,] could be present even where there was repeated penetration, but it is the specific identification of defendant as perpetrator which crosses over the line into impermissible testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he trial court therefore erred when it admitted [the doctor's] testimony that his findings were consistent with 'the history that he received from the victim'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.