¶1*528 Judgmént reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Clarke, J., below.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Oil. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Chase, JJ.
197 N.Y. 527
90 N.E 1158
Fox v. . Smith
Decided December 17, 1909
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1909-12-17
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 10, 1908, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1909-12-17
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1985
3 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →