Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 OHIOAPP3D 201 - State v. Blankenburg

State v. Blankenburg’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

105 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Dehass · Hamling v. United States · State v. Hancock · State v. DePew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only in the exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily against the conviction.”
    32 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] unanimous concurrence of all three judges on the court of appeals panel reviewing the case is required to reverse a judgment on the weight of the evidence in a jury trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]o be admissible, the other-act evidence must tend to show by substantial proof one or more of the things that the rule or statute enumerates,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.