Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Okla. 368 - Johnston v. Penwell

Johnston v. Penwell’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1978

5 state decisions

201946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKeever Drilling Co. v. Egbert · Skelly Oil Co. v. Johnson · McGeorge Corp. v. State Industrial Corp. · Fischer-Kimsey Co. v. King · Skelly Oil Co. v. Grimm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The State Industrial Commission is authorized to excuse the giving of the statutory written notice provided for by 85 O.S. 1941 , § 24, either on the ground (1) that notice for some sufficient reason could not have been given; or (2) on the ground that the insurance carrier or the employer, as the case may be, has not been prejudiced by the failure to give the statutory written notice. "Where there is competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the finding that the employer or the insurance carrier, as the case may be, has not been prejudiced by failure to give the statutory written notice and the trial commissioner, or the State Industrial Commission, has excused the giving of the statutory written notice on that ground, the award will not be vacated for failure to give the notice required in the time and manner prescribed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When, under an express or implied agreement transportation is furnished by an employer as an incident to the employment, an'injury sustained by an employee going to his place of employment in a vehicle furnished by the employer and under the employer’s control, arises out of and is within the course of the employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.