Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Okla. 503 - Miller v. Young

Miller v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1999

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

70194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. Harris · Messick v. Johnson · Dixon v. Stoetzel · Brinkley v. Patton Et Ux. · Turk v. Warr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is an elementary principle of the law of contracts that in order to recover upon a contract, the contractor * * * must first establish his own performance or a valid excuse for his failure to perform (citing authorities including Am.Jur.). Since plaintiff failed under the uncontradicted proof to complete the work he contracted to do, without valid excuse for such failure, he was entitled to no judgment against defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.