Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 SO2D 315 - Dotty v. State

Dotty v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2011

16 state decisions

60196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Bryan · Williams v. State · 141 Pa. Super. 107 - Commonwealth v. Brownmiller · Payne v. Payne · Taylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is held equivalent to the copulative conjunction”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Florida Statute 905.17 (1939-1970) "No person shall be present at the sessions of the grand jury except * * * the prosecuting attorney * * *." Florida Statute 905.17 (1970-1974) "No person shall be present at the sessions of the grand jury except * * * the state attorney or his designated assistant * * *." Florida Statute 905.19 (1939-1970) "The prosecuting attorney or assistant prosecuting attorney shall attend the grand jury * * *." Florida Statute 905.19 (1970-1974) "The state attorney or an assistant state attorney shall attend * * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment on the ground the prosecuting attorney and the assistant prosecuting attorney were both present before the grand jurors at the same time for the purpose of examining witnesses in their presence and giving the grand jurors legal advice regarding the offense lodged against the appellant contrary to F.S.A. §§ 905.17 and 905.19.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.