Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 SO3D 572 - Mobley v. State

Mobley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Clark v. State · Sanchez v. Fernandez · Thomas v. State · 14 So. 3d 1021 - Shenfeld v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ection 948.06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 is required in order for the probationary period to be tolled,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is axiomatic that once a term of probation has expired, a court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for revocation of probation based on a violation which occurred during the probation period unless, during the term of probation, appropriate steps were taken to revoke or modify probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[u]pon the filing of an affidavit alleging a violation of probation . . . and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02, a warrantless arrest under this section, or a notice to appear under this section, the probationary period is tolled until the court enters a ruling on the violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.