Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

197 S.W. 869

Ramsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1917

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1917-10-10

<p>Ceiminax, Law <&wkey;1114(3) — Appeal—Record —Absence op Evidence and Bill op Exceptions.</p> <p>The motion for a new trial having raised the questions of insufficiency of the evidence and refusal of requested instructions, there is. nothing to review, where the evidence is not in the record, and no bill of exceptions was reserved.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1920

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1917-10-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAYIDSON, P. J.

¶1Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol; his punishment being assessed at 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

¶2The motion for a new trial raises the insufficiency of the evidence and the refusal of the court to give requested instructions. The evidence is not in the record, nor was any bill of exceptions reserved. There is nothing, therefore, presented that can be revised.

¶3The judgment will be affirmed.

/197/sw/869 · .json · Public domain