Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

197 S.W.2d 108

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1946

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1946-10-30

Relies on Williams v. State · 148 Tex. Crim. 104 - Edwards v. State · Newsom v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1946-10-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1965

4 state decisions

20194619501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

¶1This appeal is from a conviction of an assault to rape with a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

¶2The proceedings appear to be regular. We find no objections to the court’s charge. There is a motion for a new trial which complains of the introduction of certain evidence and of arguments made by the prosecuting attorney. These matters are not brought forward by bills of exception and we cannot, under the rule, consider them for any purpose.

¶3The statement of facts is in question and answer form which under Article 760, Section 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be considered by us. Amended 1931, 42d Leg., 1st C. S., p. 75, ch. 34, § 7. Newsom v. State, 145 Tex.Crim.R. 473, 169 S.W.2d 195; Williams v. State, 145 Tex.Crim.R. 634, 170 S.W.2d 735; Edwards v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 185 S.W.2d 111.

¶4In the state of the record as it appears before us nothing is presented for our consideration. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

/197/sw2d/108 · .json · Public domain