Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 SW3D 658 - State v. Folson

State v. Folson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Speth v. New Jersey · McMullan v. National Bank of Commerce · State v. Chaney · State v. Pike · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any information may be amended or an information may be substituted for an indictment at any time before verdict or finding if: (a) No additional or different offense is charged, and (b) A defendant’s substantial rights are not thereby prejudiced. No such amendment or substitution shall cause delay of a trial unless the court finds that a defendant needs further time to prepare a defense by reason of such amendment or substitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.