Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 TENN 101 - Smith v. Archer

Smith v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1963
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Afro-American Co. · Teas v. Luff-Bowen Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to authorize a joinder of causes of action involving different parties defendant, it is necessary that each of such causes shall affect all of the defendants”. In 1 Am.Jur.2d, Actions, Sec. 123, Page 643, it is stated: “As a general rule under the modern practice, it is a prerequisite to the joinder of different causes of ac tion in a single pleading that all the canses should affect all parties to the action, both parties defendant and parties plaintiff.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘To authorize a joinder of causes of action in tort, it is necessary that they each affect all the plaintiffs; hence a joint claim cannot be united with a single one, nor when the same tort affects the several rights of different persons can their cause of action be joined.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.