Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 U.S. 356 - Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank

Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank’s Empirical Analysis

197 U.S. 356 · 1905

Citation profile

375
cited by 375 later decisions
24
cited 24 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

168 federal appellate · 64 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 375 later decisions (24 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2023 · most notably Commissioner v. Acker (1959), United States v. Naftalin (1979)

168 federal appellate · 64 district · 43 state decisions

4901905191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · New York County National Bank v. Massey · Tiffany v. National Bank · In re Richard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 375 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not to be subjected to a penalty unless the words of the statute plainly impose it,”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(Jan a creditor of a bankrupt, who has received a merely voidable preference, and who has in good faith retained such preference until deprived thereof by the judgment of a court upon a suit of tbe trustee, thereafter prove the debt so voidably preferred T’”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t cannot in reason be said that the omission ... gives rise to the implication that it was the intention of Congress to reenact it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.