Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments) · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Miller v. Youakim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No provision of the Civil Service Reform Act shall be applied by the Board in such a way as to affect any administrative proceeding pending at the effective date of such provision. “Pending”' is considered to encompass existing agency proceedings, and appeals before the Board or its predecessor agencies, that were subject to judicial review or under judicial review on January 11, 1979, the date on which the Act became effective. An agency proceeding is considered to exist once the employee has received notice of the proposed action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No provision of this Act shall affect any administrative proceedings pending at any time such provision takes effect. Orders shall be issued in such proceedings and appeals shall be taken therefrom as if this Act had not been enacted, (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.