Com. v. Boyd Chisholm, N.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · Steagald v. United States · Com. of Pa. v. Romero · United States v. Vasquez-Algarin · 441 Pa. Super. 539 - Commonwealth v. Conception
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f entry into a residence is necessary to search for [an individual named on an arrest warrant], then the warrant must reflect a magisterial determination of probable cause to search that residence, regardless of whether the warrant is styled as an 'arrest warrant' or a 'search warrant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Duke“police officers may enter the home of the subject of an arrest warrant to effectuate the arrest, but they must obtain a valid search warrant before entering the home of a third party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Duke“determined that the proper standard for determining whether a suspect lives at a particular residence could not be anything less than probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Duke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.