In Re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably FutureSource LLC v. Reuters Ltd. (2002), Precision Industries, Inc. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC (2003)
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco · Orion Pictures Corporation Orion Pictures Corporation v. Showtime Networks Inc · Michigan Employment Security Commission v. Wolverine Radio Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This section clarifies section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code to mandate that lessees cannot have their rights stripped away if a debtor rejects its obligation as a lessor in bankruptcy. This section expressly provides guidance in the interpretation of the term “possession” in the context of the statute. The term has been interpreted by some courts in recent cases to be only a right of possession (citations omitted). This section will enable the lessee to retain its rights that appurtenant to its leasehold. These rights include the amount and timing of payment of rent or other amounts payable by the lessee, the right to use, possess, quiet enjoyment, sublet and assign.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he trustee may sell property under subsection (b) or (c) of this section free and clear of any interest in such property of an entity other than the estate, only if ... such interest is in bona fide dispute ...” 11 U.S.C. § 363 (f)(4). . Section § 363(k) does not use the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o allow a sale free and clear of a leasehold interest pursuant to § 363 ... would effectively provide a debtor with means of dispossessing the lessee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.