Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 B.R. 270 - In Re Hollars

In Re Hollars’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2004
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6001 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Gran v. Internal Revenue Service · In Re Dakota Industries, Inc. · In Re White · In Re Compass Marine Corp. · In Re Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Claim based on a Writing. When a claim, or an interest in property of the debtor securing the claim, is based on a writing, the original or a duplicate shall be filed with the proof of claim. If the writing has been lost or destroyed, a statement of the circumstances of the loss or destruction shall be filed with the claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Debtor challenges the claim because no supporting documentation was attached. In this position, debtor is mistaken. Quite simply, the claim of the IRS is not founded upon a writing, but rather is based upon the United States Constitution and federal legislation which grants the federal government the power to lay and collect taxes on income.... Accordingly, the supporting documentation requirement of Rule 3001(c) is not applicable in the instant case. (Cites omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.