People v. Camillo’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morissette v. United States · 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · 37 Cal. 3d 873 - People v. Lance W. · 3 Cal. 3d 595 - People v. West · 32 Cal. 3d 468 - People v. Sims
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A requirement that the false statement or representation be made knowingly or with intent to deceive or defraud appears to be an element of the crime described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 10980 subdivision (c) ... but because the necessary mental state was not raised as an issue on appeal, we have no reason to so hold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferreira v. Ashcroft“[n]o doubt such a requirement is implicit in the statute, particularly in light of its use of the phrase `or other fraudulent device.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferreira v. Ashcroft“[a]bsent any requirement of scienter, the statute would be legally and constitutionally suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferreira v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.