Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 CALAPPSUPP2D 843 - People v. Cantor

People v. Cantor’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2014

6 state decisions

20196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 35 Cal. 2d 242 - Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners · 56 Cal. 2d 868 - People v. Busch · People v. Jordan · 56 Cal. App. 2d 635 - In Re Maki · In Re Ochse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is our considered opinion that, in the light of the record in this case, the practice of hypnotism as a curative measure or mode of procedure by one not licensed to practice medicine, amounts to the unlawful practice of medicine. While it may be that one day the use of hypnotism may be recognized sufficiently to warrant the Legislature to license that practice, to date it has not done so. To the extent that appellant employed or attempted to practice his hypnotic powers, he was practicing medicine within the meaning of [the statute]. [29]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “practicing or attempting to do so, or advertising or a holding out as practicing, any system or mode of treating the sick or afflicted, or diagnosing, treating, or prescribing for any ailment, disease, disorder, or other mental or physical condition of any person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.