Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 Colo. 362 - Charnes v. Arnold

Charnes v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
9
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably People v. Wolf (1981), City of Wenatchee v. Durham (1986)

29 state decisions

10019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Oaxaca · 46 Ill. App. 3d 240 - People v. Clark · 381 F. Supp. 43 - United States v. Getz · People v. Roddy · Reyes v. Slayton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When any peace officer is in fresh pursuit of any alleged offender, having a warrant for his arrest or having knowledge that such warrant has been issued, or, in the absence of an arrest warrant, when the offense was committed in the officer’s presence or the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the alleged offender has committed a criminal offense, and the alleged offender crosses a boundary line marking the territorial limit of his authority, such peace officer may pursue him beyond such boundary line and make the arrest, issue a summons and complaint, or issue a notice of penalty assessment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the pursuit without unnecessary delay of a person who has committed a crime or who is reasonably believed to have committed a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.