State v. Van Sant’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Shay v. Rossi (2000), State v. Sawyer (1993)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Abney v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Wade v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The fifth amendment to the United States constitution provides, in relevant part,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although the Connecticut constitution contains no specific double jeopardy provision, “ ‘the due process guarantees of article first, § 8, have been held to include such a protection.’ ” State v. Van Sant, 198 Conn. 369 , 375 n.5, 503 A.2d 557 (1986), quoting State v. Rawls, 198 Conn. 111 , 113 n.3, 502 A.2d 374 (1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeMayo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.