State v. Madera’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 district · 202 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 206 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Adolphson v. Zoning Board of Appeals (1988), State v. Badgett (1986)
4 district · 202 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 206 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pleas of Guilty and the Loss of Constitutional Rights: The Current Price of Pleading Guilty,”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] fundamental purpose of the criminal law is to protect individual citizens from the criminal conduct of another.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““The inherent power of the trial court to reject such a plea where it is clearly inappropriate affords some protection against misuse of the statutory procedure, but the court is not in a position to evaluate such prosecutorial concerns as the significance of a particular ruling to the ultimate disposition of a ease or the problems entailed by delaying a trial for the period necessary to obtain appellate relief. The prosecutor is ordinarily much more familiar with the evidence to be presented that may not be affected by the ruling and also with the effect of delay incident to an appeal upon the availability of witnesses. Even where the prosecutor looks favorably on the conditional plea ... the parties, as well as the trial court, must be sure that the issues reserved can properly be reviewed on the record available.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.