Airlines Transp., Inc. v. Tobin’s Empirical Analysis
198 F.2d 249 · 1952
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Caserta v. Home Lines Agency, Inc. (1959), 92 Wash. 2d 789 - Port of Seattle v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission (1979)
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)
Relies on Phillips v. Walling US · United States v. Yellow Cab Co. · Stafford v. Wallace · The Daniel Ball · United States v. Capital Transit Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]axicabs ... operate without fixed routes or schedules and are at the service of the individual customer as to time and destination in order to serve his personal convenience.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.