Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 F.2d 289 - Ottenheimer v. Whitaker

Ottenheimer v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis

198 F.2d 289 · 1952

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2000
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2000 · most notably Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (1986), University of Texas Medical Branch v. United States (1977)

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

80195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 409 · 33 U.S.C. § 411

Relies on Dushane v. Beall · Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. v. Scales · Spalding v. Dickinson · Quinn v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an Act of Congress in the public interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It seems obvious to us that a rule which is not provided by statute but built up by the courts to facilitate the administration and distribution of assets of a bankrupt estate should not be extended to reach such an unreasonable and unjust result. The judge made rule must give way when it comes into conflict with a statute enacted to ensure the safety of navigation ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.