Hammond v. Hammond

United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Argued March 17, 1952.

Decided June 26, 1952.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia · decided 1952-06-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on Boyce v. Boyce

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-06-26

¶1 *530James T, Wright, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2William L. Houston, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR, K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant’s other contentions but find no error.

¶6Affirmed.