Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 F.2d 591 - Rolfes v. Dwellingham

Rolfes v. Dwellingham’s Empirical Analysis

198 F.2d 591 · 1952

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1989
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1989

17 federal appellate ·

1001952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 45 U.S.C. § 156 (Railway Labor Act)

Relies on Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 · Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard · Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in aid of the administrative machinery provided for the adjustment of disputes in the Railway Labor Act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “change in agreements affecting * * * working conditions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.