Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
198 F.2d 883 · 1952
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably List v. Fashion Park, Inc. (1965), Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. Love (1970)
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78I (§ 9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp. · Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co. · Dioguardi v. Durning · Hughes v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“$ * * $ $ “(b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on -a national securities exchange or any security not so registered, any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.