United States v. Kemble’s Empirical Analysis
198 F.2d 889 · 1952
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Enmons (1973), United States v. Green (1956)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 106 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 113 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. Petrillo · United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United States Bay Counties Dist Council of Carpenters · United States v. Resnick · United States v. Local 807 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen & Helpers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he conclusion seems inescapable that Congress intended that the language used in the [Hobbs Act] be broad enough to include, in proper cases, the forced payment of wages.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“understanding that [a driver] did not want or need a helper and was not authorized to employ one, nevertheless forcibly insisted that [the driver] pay $ 10, described as a day's wages, for a supernumerary to do what [the driver] himself was paid to do and was accomplishing when [the union agent] intervened.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. " (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.