United States v. Keifer’s Empirical Analysis
198 F.3d 798 · 1999
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Gallant (2008), United States v. Higgins (2002)
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Farnsworth · United States v. Smith · United States v. Green · United States v. Rice · United States v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), 644 F.3d 1126 , 1129 (10th Cir. 2011) ("The mandate rule is a discretion-guiding rule that generally requires trial court conformity with the articulated appellate remand.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any relevant evidence the court could have heard at the first sentencing hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“even on issues that were not the specific subject of the remand.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.