Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 F.3d 85 - L-Tec Electronics Corporation v. Cougar Electronic Organization Inc Sol Mayer Dan Reich Cougar Electronic Organization

L-Tec Electronics Corporation v. Cougar Electronic Organization Inc Sol Mayer Dan Reich Cougar Electronic Organization’s Empirical Analysis

198 F.3d 85 · 1999

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Adelphia Recovery Trust v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n (2011), Cieszkowska v. Gray Line New York (2002)

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

3201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation · Travelers Insurance v. 633 Third Associates · Woods v. Dunlop Tire Corp. · Saud v. Bank of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]es judicata applies even where new claims are based on newly discovered evidence, unless `the evidence was either fraudulently concealed or it could not have been discovered with due diligence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Res judicata, or claim preclusion, means that 'even claims based upon different legal theories are barred provided they arise from the same transaction or occurrence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n deciding a disputed issue of state law in a diversity case, a federal [trial] court should attempt to discern what the highest court of that state would decide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.