Anthony Miller v. John E. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7702
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Clark County School District v. Breeden · Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to show that the notice ... violated his due process rights, Miller must show that (1) the notice was defective, and (2) he detrimentally relied upon that notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.