Papszycki v. Gurka

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Animals, § 14*—when persons not bound to exercise care to avoid being bitten by domestic animals. Persons are not hound to exercise care to avoid being injured by domestic animals not naturally dangerous without notice of the vicious tendencies of the particular animal.</p> <p>2. Animals, § 39*—when plaintiff need not allege and prove due care to avoid injury -from animal. In an action to recover damages for being bitten by a dog, it is not necessary for plaintiff to aver and prove due care and caution for his own protection, such facts being matter of defense.</p> <p>3. Appeal and ebbob, § 1313*—when presumed that case tried on regular call of calendar. Where nothing to the contrary appears in the record, it will be presumed that a case is tried on the regular call of the calendar.</p> <p>4. Damages, § 228*—when notice to defendant after default not prerequisite to holding inquest to assess damages. Where a default is entered in an action tried on the regular call of the calendar, notice to the defendant after such default is not necessary to enable the court to hold an inquest for assessing damages.</p>