Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 ILLAPP3D 960 - Pavela v. Malone

Pavela v. Malone’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2014

22 state decisions

180199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Greene v. Lindsey · 132 Ill. App. 3d 90 - Ralston v. Plogger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there is a fundamental reason why the publication notice requirements of section 18 — 3 of the Act should not be extended to actual notice: the legislature expressly limited section 18 — 3 to publication and it is not within the province of this court to rewrite statutory law. Rather, this court’s function is to interpret the law. Ralston v. Plogger (1985), 132 Ill. App. 3d 90 , 476 N.E.2d 1378 .” ( 198 Ill. App. 3d at 964 , 556 N.E.2d at 681 .)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.