Wilson v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2019
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barber v. Turberville · Smith v. Kincaid · Fischer v. Dover Steamship Co. · Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij, N. V. v. Jay Emm, Inc. · Lackey v. Medora Township of Reno County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . [T]hat our entire judicial process for trial of civil controversies would be destroyed if a court’s summons or other process were permitted to be treated with neglectful indifference.” (p. 322.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““For good cause shown the court may set aside a judgment entered by default in accordance with K. S. A. 60-260 (b).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Since the foregoing provision was lifted from rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure we may look to federal cases for its construction and application. “Relief under the provision quoted is not a matter of right, but is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. See, e. g., Fischer v. Dover Steamship Co., 218 F. 2d 682 ; Smith v. Kincaid, 249 F. 2d 243 ; and Petition of Pui Lan lee, 20 F. R. D. 399. Discretion should ordinarily incline towards granting relief in order that judgments reflect the true merits of the case. (Barber v. Turberville, 218 F. 2d 34 .) However, it is desirable that final judgments not be lightly disturbed and the motions and the grounds for that relief should be closely scrutinized.” (p.796.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.