Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 KY 285 - Asher v. Gibson

Asher v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 1971

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

120192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitley County Land Co. v. Powers' Heirs · Farnsworth v. Barret · Sackett v. Jeffries · Carter v. Elk Coal Co. · Big Sandy Co. v. Ramey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But in order for such consequences (the ripening of a possessory title) to be visited upon the true owner it is everywhere recognized that the adverse holder must, in the language of some of the opinions, ‘keep.his flag flying,’ which is to say that his holding must be continuous and uninterrupted for the statutory period, and that an uninterrupted claim of title throughout that time must be made by the one so holding. In other words, the adverse possession must be such as to give a cause of' action for every moment of the statutory period; if it is broken it ceases to run and will not again accrue until a new adverse holding is begun, in which case the prior holding before the break may not be tacked on to the subsequent one to complete the period.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.