Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 Minn. 175 - State v. Puent

State v. Puent’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1967
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1967

6 state decisions

301936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washburn v. People · Faull v. State · State v. Dooms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination as provided by law, before a justice of the peace or other examining magistrate or officer, unless such person shall waive his right to such preliminary examination.” (Italics supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.