Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 MISC 21 - Eisner v. Schulman

Eisner v. Schulman’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bernfeld v. Freedenberg · Saprones v. Kontzamanys

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . '. . . What then did they intend when they used the language set out in the covenant? I believe they used such verbiage in the same way any other simple folks would have used it. They meant what is commonly understood by the word “block,” that if one went out of the store and walked five blocks in any direction that defendant could not do business within the area of the figure thus formed by the exterior boundaries of the distances walked. . . . “. ; ( 96 N.Y.S.2d at 460 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.