¶1concurs in three points .of this opinion, viz.: that the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded, first, for the refusal to grant the change of venue; second, for the improper cross-examination of the defendant; third, for the improper remarks of the attorney for the State.
198 Mo. 23
State v. Barrington
Decided June 20, 1906
Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1906-06-20
Louis County Circuit Court . — Hon. ■ Jno. W. MoElhin/ney, Judge. (1) The State failed to indorse upon the indictment the names of twenty-nine of its important witnesses, most of whom were known to it before the indictment was found. These witnesses were persons who swore to the strongest, and most fundamental and primary, of the facts involved in this case.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1906-06-20
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Nickels v. State (1925), State v. McGee (1935)
3 federal appellate · 99 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →