Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

198 N.C. 661

153 S.E 118

Lineberger v. . Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1930-05-07

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-05-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1962

4 state decisions

201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stacy, C. J.

¶1 The case turns on the question as to whether Laban Lineberger acquired an undivided one-half interest in fee, or is able to convey such an interest, in the lands devised to him in items three and four of his father’s will.

¶2 His Honor correctly held for the plaintiffs. Roane v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 628, 127 S. E., 626. It is provided by C. S., 4162, that when real estate is devised to any person the same shall be held and construed to be a devise in fee simple, unless such devise shall, in plain and express words show, or it shall be plainly intended by the will, or some part thereof, that the testator intended to convey an estate of less dignity. Hence, under this statute, an unrestricted devise of real estate passes the fee. Barbee v. Thompson, 194 N. C., 411, 139 S. E., 838. Indeed, it is generally necessary that restraining expressions be used to confine a devise to the life of the devisee. Holt v. Holt, 114 N. C., 241, 18 S. E., 967.

¶3 The learned counsel for the defendant has filed an elaborate brief, analyzing the will in every detail, but we think the judgment below is in keeping with the rights of the parties and the law of the case.

¶4 Affirmed.

/198/nc/661 · .json · Public domain