198 N.C. App. 177 - FMB, INC. v. Creech’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · 115 N.C. App. 377 - Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture · Veazey v. City of Durham · 143 N.C. App. 162 - Embler v. Embler · Department of Transportation v. Rowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, there is no right of immediate appeal from an interlocutory order with two exceptions: (1) the order is final as to some claims or parties, and the trial court certifies pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) that there is no just reason to delay the appeal, or (2) the order deprives the appellant of a substantial right that would be lost unless immediately reviewed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he instant case is distinguishable from Watson for several reasons. First, there is no stipulation [as to the validity of the appeal] in this case, which was a key factor in the determination in Watson that the order was immediately appealable. Second, there is no dispute in this case as to who had legal title to the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Stagecoach Village and the cases upon which it bases its analysis [including Nuckles ] deal solely with issues of condemnation and the involuntary taking of a private citizen's property by the State of North Carolina.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.