Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 NJSUPER 32 - State v. Long

State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Parker v. North Carolina · Davis v. United States · Bonanno v. United States · Hall v. Cole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “right to an impartial jury `is entitled to the most zealous protection in the context of a criminal prosecution in which the defendant faces the death penalty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution or in the indictment .. . must be made by motion before trial....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.