198 N.J. Super. 390 - Samuelson v. Samuelson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Painter v. Painter · 136 N.J. Super. 397 - Scherzer v. Scherzer · Salierno v. Micro Stamping Co. · 193 N.J. Super. 330 - Bednar v. Bednar · 147 N.J. Super. 5 - Mol v. Mol
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Grange rule is unduly restrictive, contrary to the broad discretionary powers of a court of equity and generally unfair ... [T]he trial court should also have the discretionary power to permit [the sale of equitably distributable assets] ... when basic living expenses cannot be paid in any other way. Id. at 6.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trial court should also have the discretionary power to permit a party to utilize a portion of the proceeds when ... basic living expenses cannot be paid in any other way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pelow v. Pelow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.