¶1The appellant was convicted of robbery on a pre-Miranda trial. On appeal therefrom he challenges the correctness of the use of his confession, contending it was made consequent upon an unlawful arrest. On consideration of the record and briefs we conclude the arrest, made without a warrant, was predicated upon probable cause, and, therefore, was lawful under § 901.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
¶2Affirmed.