Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 So. 2d 658 - Duncan v. Pullum

198 So. 2d 658 - Duncan v. Pullum’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2011

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

80196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 55 Cal. 2d 403 - Greene v. Superior Court · Smith v. Gifford · AUTO OWN. INS. CO. v. Hillsborough County Aviation Auth. · In Re the Estate of Boeving · 155 So. 2d 745 - Girten v. Bouvier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The portion of the order which struck appellant-defendant's counterclaim with prejudice was final and appealable. Cf: Schwertfeger v. Constant, Fla.App. 1959, 109 So.2d 173 ; Leeward & Hart Aeronautical Corp. v. South Central Airlines, Fla.App. 1966, 184 So.2d 454 ; and Hillsbow Plantation v. Plunkett, Fla. 1951, 55 So.2d 534 . The general rule is that a judgment, order or degree to be appealable as final must dispose of all issues or causes in the case; but the rule is relaxed where the judgment, order or decree adjudicates a distinct and severable cause of action. 4 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 95 (1957). This instant order terminated a separate cause of action, but arising out of the same subject matter, which defendant thought he had against plaintiff. Since his order was appealable, the motion filed by appellee seeking to quash the appeal was properly denied." (Emphasis supplied.) 198 So.2d 658, 660-661 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as an aspect of the final adjudication appealed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.